Talk:Weyoun

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

delete, December 13, 2019, see discussion.
keep, May 14, 2017, see discussion.

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Weyoun redirect.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Star Trek Mid‑importance

	This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Star Trek, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to all Star Trek-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the redirect attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Star TrekWikipedia:WikiProject Star TrekTemplate:WikiProject Star TrekStar Trek articles
Mid	This redirect has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Fictional characters

This redirect is within the scope of WikiProject Fictional characters, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of fictional characters on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Fictional charactersWikipedia:WikiProject Fictional charactersTemplate:WikiProject Fictional charactersfictional character articles

Untitled

Would it be fair to consider Weyoun a sycophant? --talk to me crimes against humanity02:24, 9 May 2006 (UTC) [reply]

Well, the Vorta -are- bred and conditioned to serve the Founders and their allies without question. (Perhaps except the Cardassians which both the Founders and the Vorta saw as poor allies and perfectly expendable) 85.19.140.9 11:35, 15 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Combs favorite character

A fact tag was placed for the notation that Weyoun was Jeffrey Combs' favorite Trek role. I want to say that this comes from a video interview at StarTrek.com but I don't have time to rewatch it now. Maybe later; I'm noting it here in case someone else watches it and confirms before I am able to. -- Hawaiian717 00:50, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I posted the tag; I'll look at the videos and let y'all know what I spot. --EEMeltonIV 00:59, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The link above is broken but the interview was reposted on Youtube where he does indeed say that Weyoun was his favorite character. [1] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.200.143.18 (talk) 13:18, 5 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

An article at StarTrek.com says "Weyoun is Combs’ own pick for his favorite performance in all of Trek" "Every 'Star Trek' Character Played By Jeffrey Combs, Ranked". StarTrek.com. and even though the video they link to is also dead that should be a good enough source.

The same article makes another an interesting claim: "When Combs portrayed both Weyoun and Brunt in the episode “Dogs of War,” he became the first Trek actor to portray two different, completely unrelated recurring characters in the same episode." -- 109.77.204.50 (talk) 11:16, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appearances?

All the other important secondary characters have appearance listings. Why not Weyoun? - Darkhawk

IPA

How is the name pronounced? Someone add an IPA, please.

[WAY-OON] would do as a decent interim phonetic description.--24.190.71.206 (talk) 11:21, 28 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect?

Is there a reason all show characters not having significant cross-references (i.e. notable cultural or artistic impact) don't redirect to a single summarizing page? For e.g. Minor Star Trek DS9 Characters. It feels like that would be preferable from an organizational standpoint and also the change'd be worth it just by saving the overhead, I don't want my $50 annual donation going for .... stuff, like that doesn't have to be. I know how volunteerism works, but again... time better spent... I just realized, nobody but NOBODY's gonna be reading the talk section of the Weyoun page. Nooooo! 24.190.116.247 (talk) 17:57, 17 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notability

Ping User:Jclemens: anything you can find to warrant keeping this? As written, it seems like a clear failure of notability, just an in-universe bio. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 06:57, 2 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Weyoun. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20060328074038/http://www.startrek.com/startrek/videoview?id=8275 to http://www.startrek.com/startrek/videoview?id=8275

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 08:38, 21 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Deleted

Deleted with one delete vote? I would say it should of been at least redirected as this is a well documented character. Starspotter (talk) 18:43, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have undeleted the page history, with the consent of the closer, see Wikipedia talk:Articles for deletion/Weyoun (2nd nomination). So in effect the close has belatedly been implemented as "redirect" rather than "delete". – Fayenatic London 20:52, 11 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks a lot for this! I personally think a redirect is fine, but a lack of opinions made this seem very questionable. Starspotter (talk) 22:01, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]