Talk:Wet cleaning

This article was nominated for deletion on 5 January 2016. The result of the discussion was speedy keep.

Seemed silly that such a small article should still need to be copyedited.

- Moved external link to its own section. - Changed tone of the article. Original author seemed to be trying to "sell" wet cleaning. Seemed biased. - Made disambiguation into an actual disambiguation link. That article remains to be written. - Corrected and referenced information that needed referencing. - Marked "citation needed" for others. - Removed "copy-edit" tag.

I generally left information there that was relevant and interesting, even if it needed a citation, but otherwise corrected/revised (if needed) and referenced the rest from accurate sources. Used Harvard referencing.

Seriously, article needs better sources when it makes generalizations about tailors.

It would be nice if the exact pages describing kimono-washing in Liza Dalby's book could be found.

Jessim (talk) 21:39, 3 January 2008 (UTC)Jessim[reply]

The "article" that was linked on this page did not appear to have any data whatsoever, and at only a single paragraph seemed unencyclopedic, so I have removed it. 71.198.181.70 (talk) 17:42, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]