Talk:West Side Market

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Ohio portal This article is supported by WikiProject Ohio.

National Register of Historic Places Low‑importance

	National Register of Historic Places portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject National Register of Historic Places, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of U.S. historic sites listed on the National Register of Historic Places on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.National Register of Historic PlacesWikipedia:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesTemplate:WikiProject National Register of Historic PlacesNational Register of Historic Places articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Supermarket boom?

The only supermarket within walking distance of the West Side Market is Dave'e (which itself is really not all that great). The nearest Tops and Giant Eagles are about 10 minutes by car. Pimlottc 18:40, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising

-- PRRFAN ALRIGHT - I'M SORRY- I'VE BEEN SEARCHING: BUT CANNOT FIND WHY SOME LINKS ARE PERMITTED TO LIST COMMERCIAL NAME - LIKE CRAINS CLEVELAND BUSINESS PAGE RIGHT ABOVE THIS - ABOUT WSM. NOT SURE WHY THIS CAN'T LIST THE SPONSOR OF INFORMATION - THE WEBCAM THAT WE ARE PAYING FOR/HOSTING ?? PLEASE JUST REMOVE LINK IF YOU CAN'T CALL IT BY PROPER NAME OR INCLUDE OUR COMPANY NAME JUST LIKE CRAINS CLEVELAND. THANKS. AND HAVE A GREAT DAY -- 11:51, October 11, 2013‎ Pavmaner

Good question. One answer is that the label "Crains Cleveland" tells the reader something about the linked-to information. It provides a clue about its trustworthiness; for example, you'd presumably want to know before you click a link whether you were going to the New York Times or the Weekly World News. But a livecam is pretty much a livecam; adding a sponsor name to it doesn't tell the reader much, and does run directly afoul of Wikipedia's promotion guidelines. PRRfan (talk) 16:06, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks, by the way, for adding the link to the livecam; the link itself is a good addition to this article. PRRfan (talk) 16:12, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wait til you see our upgraded mega-pixel camera of this view... coming next week... same link. Pavmaner (talk) 16:46, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Advertising vs Sponsorship Designation

Hi our Wiki editors! First, let me apoligize in advance, as I'm not intimately familiar with policies of Wiki. I've read documentation, but what I see is different that docs indicate. In this example, Crains Cleveland Business has page dedicated to West Side Market.

In the External Links section, it lists "Crains Cleveland Business: Cleveland Landmarks Page". It's obvious to me, as a reader, Crains Cleveland Business is the source, producer, and sponsor of the attached page. Listing Crains Cleveland Business does nothing to add contextual value - it only serves to further advertise their business.

I have added a link with our companies West Side Market webcam. We are the source, producer, and sponsor of the webcam. I'm not clear on why editors insist on removing some company names but permit other company names in External links and other sections of pages.

Thank you in advance ...and please add InsureCLE or remove our link.

-PHIL — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pavmaner (talk • contribs) 16:10, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Phil. Did you see my comment above drawing a distinction between the Crains link and your link? Also, if you'd like to remove the link, feel free to do so (although a) someone else might re-add it as a valuable contribution and b) I would think you'd want the traffic to your site no matter whether your firm's name is on the Wikipedia page.) PRRfan (talk) 16:17, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

OK- thanks for your time! Still don't completely understand when source of information elevates to level of mention of source in Wiki article, seems nothing other than subjective notoriety. I see many many wiki articles that mention privately owned entities. Perhaps those editors just aren't following the rules. In any case, won't bother you with this again. I've been reading up on WIKI... even know how to use TALK page instead of article, and sign now.. .maybe ... :) Pavmaner (talk) 16:42, 11 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Removed links to random other markets

I removed a list of markets added by Xb2u7Zjzc32 because a) the list was at least partially redundant to one of the article's categories (Food markets in the United States) and b) there's no apparent reason why those particular ones are added. There's no need for a random list of other markets, just as there would be no reason for a list of other cities under the Cleveland article. PRRfan (talk) 14:38, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is a list of the world's oldest, greatest, and largest markets, like Paris and Tokyo, not understanding is not a defense for deletion.Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 21:19, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I'm afraid you'll have to make the connection clearer. What do the world's oldest/greatest/largest markets have to do with the West Side Market? Should the Cleveland article say "See also: Tokyo and Paris"? PRRfan (talk) 23:40, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This article is not place for a list of such markets. --Ronz (talk) 15:27, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

So you like a navbox ? You seem to do a lot deleting on this page ? All these pages were referenced at other markets, and now you have deleted them all. Do you have a connection to this place ???Xb2u7Zjzc32 (talk) 23:27, 5 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It always helps to WP:FOC.

"So you like a navbox ?" I don't understand. Are you proposing an alternative? --Ronz (talk) 15:45, 6 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]