Talk:Werrington, Staffordshire
Appearance
A fact from Werrington, Staffordshire appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 26 April 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Did you know nomination
[edit]- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Kingsif (talk) 13:01, 20 April 2021 (UTC)
( )
- ... that the windmill in Werrington was built to grind corn but later converted to grind coal into briquettes? Source: "Towards the end of its life it was used for the grinding of coal to make briquette." (Werrington etc and Wetley Moor also Werrington Shortly after the start of The Millennium)
- Reviewed: Claude Callegari
- Comment: Perhaps the telecommunications tower has ruined the view of the windmill in this picture
5x expanded by EchetusXe (talk). Self-nominated at 23:28, 3 April 2021 (UTC).
- Not a review but perhaps this is a better photo to illustrate the mill? - Dumelow (talk) 10:02, 4 April 2021 (UTC)
- Yes that's much better, thank you. EchetusXe 10:30, 5 April 2021 (UTC)
- Full review:
- Article has been 5x expanded according to DYKcheck, is long enough (7950 characters), and article is within policy
- Hook is short enough and interesting. But is [1] a reliable source? It's a page hosted on a blog site
- QPQ done
- The image is freely licenced (UK has freedom of panorama), and looks good at low resolution. However, DYK says that images must be used in the article- this can be achieved by adding it to the article either as another image, or replacing the other article in the infobox
- Overall, the article looks decent, just a couple of issues to resolve. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:54, 11 April 2021 (UTC)
- Added the picture to the article now. Here is another source for the hook. This has more detail but is also a blog. EchetusXe 13:40, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
- Those sources look okay to me, article is good to go now. Joseph2302 (talk) 11:40, 17 April 2021 (UTC)