Talk:Wells Fargo Building (Philadelphia)/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Jezhotwells (talk) 19:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

I shall be reviewing this article against the Good Article criteria, following its nomination for Good Article status.

I aim to post a preliminary review within 48 hours. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:05, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

Disambiguations: none found.

Linkrot: none found. Jezhotwells (talk) 19:09, 25 June 2011 (UTC)

My apologies for the delay on this, real life issues. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:37, 1 July 2011 (UTC)

Checking against GA criteria

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

1. It is reasonably well written.

   a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):

   Prose is good, I made a few minor copy-edits. Accords with key elements of the MoS.

2. It is factually accurate and verifiable.

   a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):

   Statements are well referenced to RS, no evidence of OR.

3. It is broad in its coverage.

   a (major aspects): b (focused):

   Thorough with no unnecessary trivia.

4. It follows the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

   NPOV

5. It is stable.

   No edit wars, etc.:

   Article is stable

6. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.

   a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):

   Images licensed and tagged

7. Overall:

   Pass/Fail:

   An interesting article. Once again my apologies for the delay in completing the review. I have thoroughly read the article, made a few minor copy-edits and am happy to pass this as worthy of GA status. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:37, 1 July 2011 (UTC)