Talk:Wellington Olympic AFC

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

New Zealand Low‑importance

	New Zealand portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New Zealand, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New Zealand and New Zealand-related topics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New ZealandWikipedia:WikiProject New ZealandTemplate:WikiProject New ZealandNew Zealand articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

Football

	Association football portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Football, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Association football on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.FootballWikipedia:WikiProject FootballTemplate:WikiProject Footballfootball articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the `\|auto=` parameter.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Wellington Olympic AFC be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.

Wikipedians in Wellington may be able to help!

The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

Semi-professional?

That accurate? Doesn't FIFA use a category 'non amateur' that is closer to reality? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 103.19.100.60 (talk)

Agreed, changed it to amateur on the page. Please remember to sign your posts using four ~. NZFC^(talk) 00:44, 30 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Have a look at this. Clearly amateur doesn't fit the bill either. http://library.la84.org/OlympicInformationCenter/OlympicReview/1955/BDCE49/BDCE49f.pdf Anyway, being paid $20,000 to play first team football ( and more in some cases) is way beyond amateur. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.79.125.247 (talk) 21:04, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Unless you have proof they are being paid that much then it is just hearsay. They are considered amateur even if they receive some remuneration. Overall even if you are talking about the first team, this article is about the club and overall the club is an amateur club NZFC^(talk) 21:10, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

In that case, there might need to be some consensus on how Central league clubs are marked. Some are marked as amateur and some aren't. Solution? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 203.79.125.247 (talk) 21:31, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

They all should be marked as amateur clubs as non of them are professional. NZFC^(talk) 21:35, 9 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]