Talk:Welcome Back, Carter

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Welcome Back, Carter article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Welcome Back, Carter has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
March 3, 2011	Good article nominee	Listed

Television: Episode coverage Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Episode coverage task force (assessed as Low-importance).

Animation: American / Television / Family Guy Low‑importance

	Animation portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Animation, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to animation on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, help out with the open tasks, or contribute to the discussion.AnimationWikipedia:WikiProject AnimationTemplate:WikiProject AnimationAnimation articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the American animation work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Animated television work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Family Guy work group (assessed as Mid-importance).

Comedy Low‑importance

	Comedy portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Comedy, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of comedy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ComedyWikipedia:WikiProject ComedyTemplate:WikiProject ComedyComedy articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Women

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of women on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.WomenWikipedia:WikiProject WomenTemplate:WikiProject WomenWikiProject Women articles

Missing word

In Television critics reacted mostly to "Welcome Back, Carter", calling the storyline "hit-or-miss" the fifth word is missing - possibly "indifferently" or "negatively".Autarch (talk) 19:27, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:Welcome Back, Carter/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Coolug (talk) 16:17, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Review in progress right now Coolug (talk) 16:17, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

GA Criteria

1 - Clearly written, in good prose with correct spelling and grammar - After reading through it is clear to me that the article meets this criteria.

2 - Factually accurate according to information in reliable sources - The sources used are reliable for the content of this article. In order to further improve the article it would be worthwhile looking for any references to this episode in more mainstream publications, such as reviews of the episode in more notable publications.

3 - Without original research - There isn't any unsourced information in this article.

4 - Broad in coverage of the topic without unnecessary digressions - I would agree this article meets this criteria

5 - Neautral POV - Yes

6 - Stable - edit history seems fine

7 - Images - images all have appropriate free use or fair use licenses

Based on these points, I'm happy to give this article GA status. Well done.

Coolug (talk) 16:34, 3 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Simpsons joke

Did anyone else notice: the joke about the pronunciation of "wind" was taken from The Simpsons. I think it was the "Reaper Madness" section from Treehouse of Horror XIV. Lampman (talk) 14:47, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You'd need a source to establish that the joke was an intentional reference before it could be included in this article; otherwise it's original research. Cheers. Doniago (talk) 15:20, 12 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Joust

I don't think the limo-joust thing is, for lack of a better phrase, worth mentioning for it's one of those way out there jokes that ends with both of them being smashed into goo. I hope I am clear. Lots42 (talk) 10:40, 17 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Welcome Back, Carter. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 01:42, 19 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]