Talk:Weighted Airman Promotion System

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion not met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

WAPS Promotion Score Calculator was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 18 February 2013 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Weighted Airman Promotion System. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

Licensing

The information in this article is based on information from here. Per that websites Copyright policy, "Information presented on this site is considered public information and may be distributed or copied. Use of appropriate byline/photo/image credits is requested."--Esprit15d 20:31, 2 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing

I found the section explaining the EPRs to be quite confusing. could someone go and rewrite it better, or at least show an example of the formula? I think this would help to clarify it quite a bit.

New content

I added a bunch of content. If anyone can explain the point system better, especially the EPR points, please do so. Isaac Crumm 03:30, 26 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Criticism section

Criticism section is based on an opinion therefore making it subjective. Unless there are articles that cite these statements, it should be removed from this article. 69.152.225.8 21:25, 20 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I added some references. --Pmsyyz (talk) 00:27, 22 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Separate subarticle pages

Sections of this articles should be broken into separate subarticle pages, e.g., the enlisted performance reports section duplicates an existing article. 69.152.255.99 04:05, 17 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

disagree, the section dupicates part of it, but this sections expands it as it relates to the topic. JDBlues 03:40, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I also see no reason to split it up. --Pmsyyz 07:35, 5 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

agreed. The section on the EPRs explain not what EPRs are, but how they function in the overall WAPS system. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.45.173.122 (talk) 18:47, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]