Talk:Webster Sycamore/GA2
GA Review
[edit]| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: Maile66 (talk · contribs) 13:35, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria
- Is it reasonably well written?
- A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- Professional level writing. No copyvio or close paraphrasing found. Spelling and grammar are as they should be.
- B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
- Everything checks out with MOS dictates.
- A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
- Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Sections for References (citations), Bibliography (appropriately formatted) and External links (3 items only).
- B. Cites reliable sources, where necessary:
- A good variety of reliable sources throughout the article.
- C. No original research:
- None that I could see.
- A. Has an appropriate reference section:
- Is it broad in its coverage?
- A. Major aspects:
- Takes us through the detailed life and death of a notable wonder of nature.
- B. Focused (see summary style):
- Absolutely focused in the body of the article, with the lead doing an appropriate summing up of the article.
- A. Major aspects:
- Is it neutral?
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- Is it stable?
- No edit wars, etc:
- Nominator has been the primary editor, with only two minor edits by one editor and one bot.
- No edit wars, etc:
- Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Cumberland Plateau map is licensed on Commons by the person who created it.
- Webster Sycamore Webster Springs WV 1920 is licensed appropriately on Commons.
- File:Webster Sycamore Webster Springs WV 1955 is appropriately noted with "Media data and Non-free use rationale".
- B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
- Images are appropriate to subject, evenly distributed in the article, and have both captions and alt text.
- A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
- Overall:
- Pass or Fail:
- Thank you for providing an opportunity to review an article I found both an enjoyable and informative read. — Maile (talk) 14:00, 10 October 2015 (UTC)
- Pass or Fail:
- Maile66, thank you so incredibly much for taking the time to engage in this Good Article review. I appreciate your attention to this article and your continued commitment to Wikipedia! -- West Virginian (talk) 19:35, 10 October 2015 (UTC)