Jump to content

Talk:Web Summit/Archives/2023/September

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Web Summit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 14:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Exciting

Isn't the word "exciting" in the 2nd sentence a bit subjective? (see: Wikipedia:Neutral point of view) --Benimation (talk) 23:24, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Recent edit

Preserving here by providing this link. The content remove was non-encyclopedic intricate detail and WP:PROMO. Please let me know if there are any concerns. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:50, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Removal of most of article without discussion

The historical information of previous and the current editions of the event have been removed without discussion, barring a one-liner entry on this page here above with the non-descriptive heading of "recent edit", with a link to the diff. I do believe that such a removal merited more discussion, especially a little bit more visibility. The edit summary cites "Excessive intricate detail & wp:promo". I am not certain as to exactly is "intricate", and as for "promo", this is standard fare for a large event of this nature. Having said that, perhaps the information can be rendered into an abbreviated table format, such as here, here and here. I have reinstated the information until more people have had the opportinity to express their views. Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 15:32, 7 November 2017 (UTC)

@Rui Gabriel Correia: Most of this is promotional 'cruft that's excluded under WP:PROMO; that's why I removed it. Sample:

References

  1. ^ "Speakers - The biggest names in tech | Web Summit". WEB SUMMIT | LISBON 2017. Retrieved 2017-08-24.
Much of it is uncited or cited to the org itself, as above. Do you feel strongly about this content? K.e.coffman (talk) 02:28, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
@K.e.coffman:, Hi. Thanks for your input. You are right, there is a lot of cruft, I agree with you on that level. At the same time, I feel that the year-by-year evolution/ history of the event is important, naturally within the project parameters. The sentence you pointed out above certainly needs to be removed, for two reasons; firstly, there is no need in a section on 2017 to mention past speakers, as each name should be mentioned (if justified/ noteworthy) within the year of appearance, secondly because that whole sentence lists only so-called celebs. I will weed out such bits once this discussion has run its course and the consensus it to retain the separate annual sections. I wrote most of the section on 2016 and — personally guilty of adding one celeb — I included Figo, within context. I certainly am not fond of trivia or gossip/ coverage of celebs. I also added 'activists' to balance out the tech moguls, and added Portuguese PM and president to highlight the seriousnes with with the event is treated in Portugal. Regards, Rui ''Gabriel'' Correia (talk) 13:46, 10 November 2017 (UTC)
@Rui Gabriel Correia: Instead of individual sections per year, I'd suggest an overall section "History", with a para, or less -- depending on sources, per year. How does this sound? K.e.coffman (talk) 02:35, 11 November 2017 (UTC)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Web Summit. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:01, 21 January 2018 (UTC)

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Web_Summit/Archives/2023/September&oldid=1187934843"