Talk:Web-footed coquí

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Web-footed coquí article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Puerto Rico Low‑importance

	Puerto Rico portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Puerto Rico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics related to Puerto Rico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Puerto RicoWikipedia:WikiProject Puerto RicoTemplate:WikiProject Puerto RicoPuerto Rico articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance

	Web-footed coquí is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article was created or improved during WikiProject Latin America's "Latin American and the Caribbean 10,000 Challenge", which started on November 1, 2016, and is ongoing. You can help out!

Status[edit]

Why is this classified under both extinct and critically endangered? -Hoekenheef 22:12, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is listed as critically endangered by the IUCN but is likely to be extinct since it has not been observed since the 70s. Joelito (talk) 23:26, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The Possibility of extinction needs to be mentioned in a reliable source, Until then, I have removed all past tense references of this nature. QuAz GaA 21:07, 20 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]
It seems to have been doing just fine in acoustic surveys in 1983 when "Characteristics of an Acoustic Community: Puerto Rican Frogs of the Genus Eleutherodactylus" (Drewry and Rand), Copeia v. 1983, no 4 was published. 4.53.4.66 (talk) 17:24, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

According to this article the recordings were taped in 1969 --Melly42 (talk) 18:34, 27 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]