Talk:Web-based slideshow

Improving the list

I agree that we seriously need to improve the list of the different web-based slideshows.

We can start by sorting them alphabetically.
We can embed them in a specification comparison table with e.g. the following columns (columns should be sortable):
- Name
- Link (to host page)
- Developer(s)
- Release Date
- License
- Comments
We can add a feature comparison table.

~ Misuo (talk) 08:42, 13 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The sections need to be turned into list items like on List of build automation software. --OMouse (talk) 01:20, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I made such a comparison, see User:Dexxor/Comparison of web-based presentation software. After it gets moved to WP:ARTICLESPACE I suggest removing the list and adding a link to the comparison in See also. – Dexxor (talk) 17:25, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Spamdexing?

This page looks to me like a simple enormous list of spam links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dominicanpapi82 (talk • contribs) 02:38, 31 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yeppers, it looks like we have to remove all external links except for the most popular ones? Also need to prefer internal links. --OMouse (talk) 02:11, 19 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Web-based slideshow. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20110521044026/http://slides.html5rocks.com:80/ to http://slides.html5rocks.com/#slide1

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 23:30, 25 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Not all slideshow tools support the listed features

The Features section contains for example “Separate slide notes for the speaker”. The thing is that some tools support this feature while others do not. I think the features section would have more value if it only listed unique features of web-based slideshows; Or maybe the advantages and disadvantages over other presentation software, e.g no need to install an extra program like PowerPoint, separation of markup and formatting, giving freedom to the users (allowing them to turn off CSS and JavaScript to search through the presentation), the problems with browser support… – Dexxor (talk) 17:55, 19 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Merge

I support merging of this page to a page on Slideshows. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Phoe6 (talk • contribs) 15:08, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]