Talk:We on Fire
Appearance
![]() | This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
No consensus to move. Vegaswikian (talk) 03:55, 4 December 2011 (UTC)
We on Fire → We On Fire – It says the new title everywhere in the page except for the title, so it must be the official name of the song. Ian Streeter (talk) 13:46, 27 November 2011 (UTC)
SupportOppose Amazon gives the name in the proposed form, but WorldCat says "We on Fire". Kauffner (talk) 12:11, 28 November 2011 (UTC)- Comment But WorldCat spells everything wrong. They didn't even spell 'Big Tymers' correctly! Ian Streeter (talk) 12:18, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:ALBUMCAPS (and, yes, I know this is not an album, but that guideline covers singles as well). Wikipedia has a house style and I see no reason why we shouldn't follow it here. Jenks24 (talk) 09:38, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- But just look at the single cover! It writes it as "We On Fire"! Ian Streeter (talk) 12:16, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- Oppose per WP:ALBUMCAPS - I don't necessarily agree with with that guideline, but we have to stick to something consistent -- Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 18:12, 28 November 2011 (UTC)
- I don't have anything against styling song titles, but this seems more like careless copy editing. Kauffner (talk) 09:23, 29 November 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the proposal. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.