Talk:We Can Do It!/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: MathewTownsend (talk · contribs) 21:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

• Will review this. Looks good! MathewTownsend (talk) 21:01, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Review

• Very nice article. I copy edited a little, mostly for conciseness and removal of repetition, but feel free to revert.[1]

GA review-see WP:WIAGA for criteria (and here for what they are not)

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose: clear and concise, correct spelling and grammar:

   B. Complies with MoS for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. Provides references to all sources:

   B. Provides in-line citations from reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Main aspects are addressed:

   B. Remains focused:

4. Does it follow the neutral point of view policy.

   Fair representation without bias:

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

• A pass. Congratulations! MathewTownsend (talk) 21:38, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Stellar! Thanks so much for the review. Binksternet (talk) 22:14, 8 February 2012 (UTC)

Great article/review! Thanks. Gandydancer (talk) 12:40, 9 February 2012 (UTC)