This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Conservatism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of conservatism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ConservatismWikipedia:WikiProject ConservatismTemplate:WikiProject ConservatismConservatism
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Canada on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CanadaWikipedia:WikiProject CanadaTemplate:WikiProject CanadaCanada-related
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Literature, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Literature on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LiteratureWikipedia:WikiProject LiteratureTemplate:WikiProject LiteratureLiterature
I really don't understand why these two sentences are important: "After World War II, he wrote a poem about General Dragoljub Mihailovich and how the Communists had him killed on trumped up charges on July 17, 1946. That killing solidified the brutal Communist rule in Yugoslavia for the next four decades which resulted in the ultimate breakup of the artificial, former Communist state." To be perfectly honest, I have not read the above mentioned poem and I do not know whether it is as important as this article suggests - is it Kirkconnell's most famous poem are probably few words that must not be left without few more - but, even if the answer to the question preceding this part of this sentence is positive, I still think that the usage of words such as "brutal" and "artifical" are dangerously threatening the neutral point of view Wikipedia articles strive to achieve. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 78.157.17.184 (talk) 13:25, 14 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]