Talk:Waterloo East railway station/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: Vincent60030 (talk · contribs) 06:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Starting this too. Dearest soon. XD VKZY^LUFan (talk) (Mind the Gap!) 06:17, 10 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Location

"The station is on the South Eastern main line 61 chains (1.2 km) down the line from Charing Cross, on the other side of the River Thames across from Hungerford Bridge." not cited i suppose?

A source has been added since the review opened Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:17, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Although Waterloo East is a through-station, it is classed for ticketing purposes as a central London terminus." deadlink

Fixed Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:17, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"There is no station building; the ticket office of the main station serves it, though there are ticket machines at the eastern end of the walkway." not cited by the reference

Removed, since the details are all covered in the preceding paragraph. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 21:17, 13 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Conclusion

And we're done! That was fast =D
Alright I’ll promote this once I’m on the big screen. Vincent^LUFan (talk) (Kenton!) 05:31, 14 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Rate	Attribute	Review Comment
1. Well-written:
	1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct.
	1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation.
2. Verifiable with no original research:
	2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline.
	2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose).
	2c. it contains no original research.
	2d. it contains no copyright violations or plagiarism.
3. Broad in its coverage:
	3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic.
	3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style).
	4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each.
	5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute.
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio:
	6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content.
	6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions.
	7. Overall assessment.