Talk:Water marble nail

Untitled

written about water marble nail, is all truth happened in reality. someone edited the page, let us know the reasons.— Preceding unsigned comment added by History of beauty (talk • contribs) 17:27, 14 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Without references it isn't possible to verify the information - see Wikipedia:Verifiability and particularly the "reliable sources" section - published sources are needed. A topic can only be suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia if other people have written about it first. I searched using the English and Japanese names mentioned in the article, but could only find one possibly reliable source, which didn't contain much information, other than that there were only Youtube and other self-published sources. If there is another name by which it is better known, this could be mentioned in the article and could be useful for finding references. There is also at least one statement that seems dubious, as it's unlikely that a technique would be eligible for copyright, although a patent may be possible. I was thinking of nominating the article for deletion, but instead I tagged it to alert readers and attract attention of other editors. Peter E. James (talk) 00:02, 15 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Referring to talk up above, the page was edited by one position as neutral and having knowledge of beauty categoly. If anythings needed in the page, please let us know. About the copyright, it could be even if precedent was unusual. About the patent, though this is my opinion, sometimes it makes people feel not free in nail-art-world, also seems it makes lose to nail-art-world and the business evolution. WaterMarbleNail method is quite different from usual nail-art methods and certainly it could be. But if the patent was announced, lots of people coudn't get joy, felt not free, was possible only watching the art without paying money for use. However, about the situation of WaterMarbleNail, seems many people using the art without knowing how the WaterMarbleNail was born and the authors exist. This information includes author's side respects people, turning to be known to people, to be get nderstanding by people, is hopeful. History of beauty (talk) 22:34, 20 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

After editing the article for grammar and style, I am considering nominating it for deletion a well because it reads like a tutorial or an advertisement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by YitzchakF (talk • contribs) 18:45, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]