Talk:Washington State Route 536/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: TCN7JM (talk · contribs) 15:37, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Sometime this weekend (but you know me by now, that means I'll do it right now). –TCN7JM 15:37, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
Infobox
- Isn't SR 20 the north end? Either way, I'm also wondering why it's north–east and not west–east. Did the DOT sign it like that?
- Huge blunder on my part. Fixed.
Route description
- Located is used twice in the first sentence. You ought to change one of these.
- "The highway travel east" Self-explanatory
History
- "ending at U.S. Route 99.[15][16] US 99" US 99 needs to be used in parentheses before being used in the following sentence as an abbreviation.
- "SR 20 was extended west to Whidbey Island and the Olympic Peninsula over SR 536 and SR 525 in 1973, shortening the highway" Which highway? I know you mean SR 536, but you mention three highways before the comma, so you should specify.
Final verdict
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (reference section):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- a (reference section):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales):
- Overall: Not bad! I think this is the least amount of fixes you've needed to make yet.
- Pass/Fail:
- Pass/Fail:
- Fixed all problems. SounderBruce 21:54, 2 February 2013 (UTC)
- I'll pass the article, but I forgot once again to mention that there is no info regarding pavement other than the repaving in 2009. Great work! –TCN7JM 01:18, 3 February 2013 (UTC)