Talk:Washington State Route 223/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Many of my comments/objections are the same as of the last review:
- Date format standardization: This time it's less important, since only Ref 1 and 3 have pub dates, but still...
- Done --Admrboltz (talk) 03:54, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- The lead is a bit short.
- Expanded some, though under summary style, I have summarized the essential parts of the article --Admrboltz (talk) 03:54, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
|format=PDF
seems to missing from Ref 2 and 5- Done --Admrboltz (talk) 03:54, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
- The refs 8-12 look a bit odd, is there a better title with letters? Im just asking.
- not really unfortunately, they are unnamed bridges... their numbers are their identifications. --Admrboltz (talk) 03:54, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
I'm passing the article. Congratulations with a good article. Eisfbnore (talk) 08:08, 12 November 2010 (UTC)
Reviewer: Eisfbnore (talk) 21:25, 10 November 2010 (UTC)