Jump to content

Talk:Washington State Route 117/GA1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

GA Review

[edit]

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

GA review (see here for criteria)
  1. It is reasonably well written.
    a (prose): b (MoS):
    You abbreviate SR 117 twice, you don't need to again in the RD.
Fixed.
OK. / --Admrboltz (talk) 15:19, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  1. It is factually accurate and verifiable.
    a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
  1. It is broad in its coverage.
    a (major aspects): b (focused):
  2. It follows the neutral point of view policy.
    Fair representation without bias:
  3. It is stable.
    No edit wars etc.:
  4. It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
    a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
    An image would be nice, but the map checks out.
  • An image can be added sometime later this year when I go on a road trip to Port Angeles.
  1. Overall:
    Pass/Fail:
    On hold. --Admrboltz (talk) 05:06, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Passing. --Admrboltz (talk) 17:46, 12 August 2009 (UTC) [reply]