Talk:Warzone (game)

	Games portal This article is part of WikiProject Board and table games, an attempt to better organize information in articles related to board games and tabletop games. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.Board and table gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Board and table gamesTemplate:WikiProject Board and table gamesboard and table game articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Expand

Well considering this article consists of 2 sentences with zero information, I threw the expansion tag up there. Warzone was a pretty extensive game with it's own storyline(s) separate from the rest of the Mutant Chronicles universe. I lack the writing skills to put out a full-blown article, but here's to hoping someone comes along and gets some good meat down. --JOK3R 19:36, 27 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I am willing to do that (or at least willing to consider doing it), but I lack source material. I have access to a couple of Mutant Chronicles books, but nothing about Warzone. Why not just write down what you know, and let others edit it? Cybotoro 23:10, 20 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There, somebody edit all that crap I just posted.

Contract

This article is now all over the place, a massive info-dump that needs to be screened vigilantly. --Agamemnon2 07:17, 19 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I rewrote the article from scratch, except for the external links. (And I added a link the large fansite of one of the players who was rather well-known on the Target forums, back when.) The type of information in the article was mostly unencyclopedic. Though, the backstory information could probably be recovered and munged, and might be encyclopedic due to its divergence from the original Mutant Chronicles backstory. However, the information about the rules really didn't belong. There was no information on the history of the game, what kind of game it was, or anything else typical of an encyclopedia article.

The only trouble with my rewrite is that apart from the two sources, much of it is from memory and needs citations. I'm going to go through it now and pepper {{fact}} tags through it where I think I've written something that could use a source. — Saxifrage ✎ 22:01, 9 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Revise

This is unfortunate. A great game, a shoddy article (no offense to anyone who wrote it - it just doesn't do justice to the game nor to encyclopedia articles). But I'm glad to see that at least there is the core of an article here. I'll see if I can add anything to it. (Because otherwise I'd just be a hypocrite.) 24.147.75.184 04:39, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]