Talk:Warrior Women with Lupita Nyong'o

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Women's History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Women's history and related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Women's HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject Women's HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Women's HistoryWomen's History articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Military history: African

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history articles

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	African military history task force

Anthropology Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Anthropology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Anthropology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AnthropologyWikipedia:WikiProject AnthropologyTemplate:WikiProject AnthropologyAnthropology articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Africa: Benin Low‑importance

	Africa portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Africa, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Africa on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AfricaWikipedia:WikiProject AfricaTemplate:WikiProject AfricaAfrica articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Benin (assessed as Low-importance).

Film: British / Documentary

	Film portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Film. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the guidelines.FilmWikipedia:WikiProject FilmTemplate:WikiProject Filmfilm articles
	This article is supported by the British cinema task force.
	This article is supported by the Documentary films task force.

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Submission review & advice

@Erik, do you have time look at my first article attempt?

Dux96 (talk) 20:33, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@331dot would appreciate your thoughts, too Dux96 (talk) 20:35, 17 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Dux96, looks like a good start, especially with substance! I would suggest the following:

Add an infobox
Expand the lead section to be more of a summary of the article body, per WP:LEAD
Write section headings in lowercase after the first word, e.g., "Critical response" and not "Critical Response"
Drop IMDb user ratings, and I don't think it's worth mentioning the lack of Rotten Tomatoes score either. Just dive straight into the reviews
For "In the media" section, I'm wary of quoting people involved with any film on their feelings about it. The emphasis should be on what independent sources thought of it.
The quote at the end of the "Summary" section is a bit lengthy and not "brief" as needed per MOS:QUOTE. I would summarize and paraphrase.

Hope that helps. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 12:49, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Erik good advice and thanks. Done, see revisions Dux96 (talk) 16:34, 18 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]