Talk:Wardner, Idaho

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Idaho portal This article is supported by WikiProject Idaho (assessed as Low-importance).

Cities

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities

Style

I've repeatedly reformatted this article for several reasons:

Section headers aren't supposed to have capital letters, except for the first word and proper nouns—thus "Further reading", not "Further Reading"
Infoboxes have picture sections for a reason—thus moving the more useful picture there
Sandwiching text between two pictures or a picture and an infobox is deprecated—thus removing the other picture from its previous place
Large amounts of white space are poor-looking—thus removing the other picture altogether, rather than moving it to the other side
The use of good hatnote templates, instead of approximations, is good: that's why we have them!—thus using {{otheruses4}} in place of {{dablink}}

Nyttend (talk) 23:33, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

- Placing a 1904 photo in an info box with current data such as 2000 census data & a zip code seems inappropriate. Perhaps the 1910 census should be substituted. http://files.usgwarchives.net/id/shoshone/census/1900/wardner-a-f.txt
- Deleting a second photo because a white spot remained after the improper relocation of the first photo borders on vandalism.Tinosa (talk) 16:01, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  - This is hardly vandalism: it's following proper style. Be careful about using loaded terms. Nyttend (talk) 18:31, 16 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

One possible citation for the History section

Not sure if anyone is looking after this page but in case Yes: https://www.fairhavenhistory.com/content/our_neighbors/wardners_castle has good info on James F. Wardner. Kent Sullivan (talk) 00:34, 15 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]