Talk:Ward Hunt

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by the politics and government work group (assessed as Low-importance).

United States courts and judges High‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States courts and judges, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the United States federal courts, courthouses, and United States federal judges on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.United States courts and judgesWikipedia:WikiProject United States courts and judgesTemplate:WikiProject United States courts and judgesUnited States courts and judges
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

New York (state) Mid‑importance

	New York (state) portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York (state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of New York on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York (state)Wikipedia:WikiProject New York (state)Template:WikiProject New York (state)New York (state)
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Bot-created subpage

A temporary subpage at User:Polbot/fjc/Ward Hunt was automatically created by a perl script, based on this article at the Biographical Directory of Federal Judges. The subpage should either be merged into this article, or moved and disambiguated. Polbot (talk) 00:20, 5 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Untrue statement removed

I have removed the statement that Hunt never wrote a majority opinion for the Court. This is demonstrably untrue; typing "Mr. Justice Hunt delivered the opinion of the Court" into Google yields lots of Hunt majority opinions, and a Westlaw search reflects more than 100 of them. It may be the case that Hunt did not deliver any historically important opinions, but I'm not sure where the statement came from that he wrote none at all. Newyorkbrad (talk) 03:50, 7 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Ward Hunt. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110123114608/http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/anthony/sbahome.html to http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/projects/ftrials/anthony/sbahome.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:22, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dispute

"Hunt had little impact on the court, siding with the majority in all but 22 cases in his ten years on the job and writing only four dissenting opinions."

Who was it that said Hunt had "little impact" on the court? According to The Woman Who Dared to Vote: The Trial of Susan B. Anthony (2012) by N. E. H. Hull, Hunt was responsible for 153 majority opinions, five dissents (not four like it says here) and three concurrences. He was also responsible for Life Insurance Co. v. Terry (1873) that Hull claims was influential on the later Model Penal Code and the insanity defense.

Hull actually mentions Wikipedia in her book and says that the information there is incorrect "The anonymous Wikipedia entry erroneously claimed that while serving on the Supreme Court, Hunt "wrote only four dissenting opinions and none for the majority."" (Hull 114). The bit about him not having written any opinions for the majority was at least removed.

I'm not a historian so I am reluctant to change the information myself but I feel like this is not correct. Sunny Nights (talk) 00:59, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed, I support adding this information. While there is evidence in the present draft for a broad claim about Hunt's impact, I would suggest adding in Hull's points to make the article a bit more complicated. N. E. H. Hull's peer-reviewed book seems like a very reliable source, so I suggest going ahead and making this change (with proper citation). 2601:410:200:41C0:75B7:E5E5:1741:A758 (talk) 19:24, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Sunny Nights: Thanks for your message (thanks also to the 2601 IP; unfortunately we have no way to ping IPs). My understanding is that Hunt participated more-or-less fully in the Court's work in his early years of service; but he was active for only a few years before he was incapacitated by illness, as discussed in the article. I'm the editor who previously removed the incorrect statement about Hunt's having authored no majority opinions (see above on this page), and I'll get hold of Hull's book and see if it warrants making any further edits. Thanks, Newyorkbrad (talk) 20:28, 9 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]