This article is within the scope of WikiProject Architecture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Architecture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchitectureWikipedia:WikiProject ArchitectureTemplate:WikiProject ArchitectureArchitecture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ChristianityWikipedia:WikiProject ChristianityTemplate:WikiProject ChristianityChristianity
This article is within the scope of WikiProject London, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of London on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.LondonWikipedia:WikiProject LondonTemplate:WikiProject LondonLondon-related
Weak oppose. This is a ship of Theseus problem. If the building had only changed one of its name, its function or its location, a merge would seem sensible. As it moved 12km east, I'd dispute that sharing some of the same building material and some of the design (I'm not clear how much) make it the 'same' (or that the modern day photograph should be used). You could equally say that the successor of St Luke's Church, Euston Road is St Luke's Church, Kentish Town. Is St Luke's Church, Euston Road independently notable? As a mention of a former parish, it could be, but there hasn't been any chance yet for much historical information to be added. Having said all that, if the merge does go ahead, IMHO the two or three incoming links such as from Euston Road should be redirected to the section heading under its former location in order not to confuse readers. --Cedderstk18:45, 18 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]