Talk:Waltz in A minor (Chopin)
Appearance
This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||
|
Requested move 14 December 2024
[edit]
It has been proposed in this section that Waltz in A minor (Chopin) be renamed and moved to Waltz in A minor, B. 150 (Chopin). A bot will list this discussion on the requested moves current discussions subpage within an hour of this tag being placed. The discussion may be closed 7 days after being opened, if consensus has been reached (see the closing instructions). Please base arguments on article title policy, and keep discussion succinct and civil. Please use {{subst:requested move}} . Do not use {{requested move/dated}} directly. |
Waltz in A minor (Chopin) → Waltz in A minor, B. 150 (Chopin) – To distinguish it from Waltz in A minor (Chopin, rediscovered 2024). The present sources also identify it as B. 150. (CC) Tbhotch™ 05:07, 14 December 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose this A minor Waltz is rather famous and standard repertoire for beginning pianists, in my mind it is a clear primary topic. Its dominance is such, that a simple google search of "Waltz in A minor" (without mentioning Chopin) brings up only this waltz. The rediscovered one is a fragmented sketch, which I doubt will retain much relevance after its discovery. As for the sources: IMSLP always includes cataloguing numbers, even for Renaissance works, in which such catalogues are essentially unknown outside academia; AllMusic is AllMusic... and it looks like the Chopin National Edition just uses "Waltz in A minor".
- Aza24 (talk) 08:16, 16 December 2024 (UTC)