Talk:Walter Zinn
Appearance
Walter Zinn has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it. Review: December 25, 2014. (Reviewed version). |
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Walter Zinn article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL |
A fact from Walter Zinn appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 2 November 2014 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:
|
This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Walter Zinn/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Reviewer: Peacemaker67 (talk · contribs) 10:30, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Rate | Attribute | Review Comment |
---|---|---|
1. Well-written: | ||
1a. the prose is clear, concise, and understandable to an appropriately broad audience; spelling and grammar are correct. |
Lead Early life
Manhattan Project
Argonne National Laboratory
Later life
Walter H. Zinn Award
| |
1b. it complies with the Manual of Style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation. |
| |
2. Verifiable with no original research: | ||
2a. it contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline. |
| |
2b. reliable sources are cited inline. All content that could reasonably be challenged, except for plot summaries and that which summarizes cited content elsewhere in the article, must be cited no later than the end of the paragraph (or line if the content is not in prose). | ||
2c. it contains no original research. | ||
3. Broad in its coverage: | ||
3a. it addresses the main aspects of the topic. | ||
3b. it stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style). | ||
4. Neutral: it represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each. | ||
5. Stable: it does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute. | ||
6. Illustrated, if possible, by media such as images, video, or audio: | ||
6a. media are tagged with their copyright statuses, and valid non-free use rationales are provided for non-free content. | ||
6b. media are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions. | ||
7. Overall assessment. |
- All changes made as suggested. Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:03, 25 December 2014 (UTC)
Categories:
- Wikipedia good articles
- Natural sciences good articles
- Wikipedia Did you know articles
- GA-Class biography articles
- GA-Class biography (military) articles
- Low-importance biography (military) articles
- Military biography work group articles
- GA-Class biography (science and academia) articles
- Mid-importance biography (science and academia) articles
- Science and academia work group articles
- WikiProject Biography articles
- GA-Class physics articles
- Low-importance physics articles
- GA-Class physics articles of Low-importance
- GA-Class physics biographies articles
- Physics biographies articles
- GA-Class military history articles
- GA-Class military science, technology, and theory articles
- Military science, technology, and theory task force articles
- GA-Class Canadian military history articles
- Canadian military history task force articles
- GA-Class North American military history articles
- North American military history task force articles
- GA-Class United States military history articles
- United States military history task force articles
- GA-Class World War II articles
- World War II task force articles