Talk:Walsworth Publishing Company

The Donning Company was nominated for deletion. The discussion was closed on 25 January 2023 with a consensus to merge. Its contents were merged into Walsworth Publishing Company. The original page is now a redirect to this page. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected article, please see its history; for its talk page, see here.

This article is rated Stub-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Companies

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Companies, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of companies on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CompaniesWikipedia:WikiProject CompaniesTemplate:WikiProject Companiescompany

??? This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

This article has been automatically rated by a bot or other tool as Stub-class because it uses a stub template. Please ensure the assessment is correct before removing the |auto= parameter.

WikiProject Companies To-do:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Article requests : Wikipedia:Requested articles/Business and economics/Companies
Assess : Category:Unassessed company articles
Copyedit : Category:Company articles needing attention
Infobox : Category:Company articles needing infoboxes
Maintain : Portal:Companies
Stubs : Help expand stub articles located at Category:Company stubs
Other :
- Tag company articles with the {{portal|Companies}} template
- Tag company talk pages with the {{WikiProject Companies}} project banner
- Answer requests for comments

Not done yet!

Sorry if the first draft looked like a spam post. I was starting a stub for a red link and wasn't done yet! --Corsair Armada (talk) 08:15, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Not quite spam anymore . . .

Hello Corsair Armada,

In response to your note on my discussion page, I have removed the spam tag. You have added enough material that the article is no longer quite that. I would suggest, however, that it still may be speedied for being an article about a small, basically vanity printing house, with no real notability. Although you have two references, neither of them is much more than advertising the fact that the company exists. If you want the article to stay, you will likely need a lot more information, and some write-ups from the regular press or a magazine of note. You've been around longer than I have; you know the drill. :-) Bielle (talk) 16:16, 17 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]