Talk:Wallraf–Richartz Museum

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts

Germany Low‑importance

	Germany portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.GermanyWikipedia:WikiProject GermanyTemplate:WikiProject GermanyGermany
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Museums

	museums portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Museums, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of museums on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MuseumsWikipedia:WikiProject MuseumsTemplate:WikiProject MuseumsMuseums
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Name of the Museum

The correct wrting of the name is "Wallraf-Richartz-Museum" - with two hyphens. --Horst bei Wiki (talk) 12:39, 19 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

That would be German spelling. "The collection Haubrich" is also German: in English you have to say "the Haubrich collection". —Wegesrand (talk) 09:31, 1 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the English name should probably be spellt with an en dash

Wallraf–Richartz Museum

since the museum’s name doesn’t refer to a Richartz of the Wallraf type (‘compound modifier‘), but to both Wallraf and Richartz independently (‘relationship or connection’). See also: MOS:ENDASH. ―BlaueBlüte (talk) 20:24, 14 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Agree. Martinevans123 (talk) 20:37, 14 June 2018 (UTC) p.s. see also Hill–Stead Museum?[reply]

Done, with slight edits for (hopefully improved) consistency. ―BlaueBlüte (talk) 04:45, 28 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]