Talk:Wallkill Valley Rail Trail/GA1
Appearance
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: intelatitalk 01:10, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
One of the best sourced and detailed articles I have read
- It is reasonably well written.
- It is factually accurate and verifiable.
- a (references):
b (citations to reliable sources):
c (OR):
- No problems, Most sentences have references.
- a (references):
- It is broad in its coverage.
- a (major aspects):
b (focused):
- Nice background of the railroad's history :)
- a (major aspects):
- It follows the neutral point of view policy.
- Fair representation without bias:
- No problems
- Fair representation without bias:
- It is stable.
- No edit wars, etc.:
- None that I see
- No edit wars, etc.:
- It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
- Nice variety of pictures, all free, and they all add nicely to the article
- a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales):
- Overall:
- Pass/Fail:
- Not now, but after the rewrite of the lead, the article is ready.
- Pass/Fail:
- I'll rework the lead paragraph immediately.
--Gyrobo (talk) 01:14, 17 November 2010 (UTC)- Done. Truth be told, the lead was the last thing I worked on. I'm going to leave the references, though, because some claims (such as the bridge being the "most awesome part" of the trail) may be contentious.
--Gyrobo (talk) 01:28, 17 November 2010 (UTC)
- Done. Truth be told, the lead was the last thing I worked on. I'm going to leave the references, though, because some claims (such as the bridge being the "most awesome part" of the trail) may be contentious.
- I'll rework the lead paragraph immediately.