Talk:Walkley Awards

	Australia portal Walkley Awards is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Australian literature (assessed as Mid-importance).
	Need help improving this article? Ask a Librarian^{What's this?} at the National Library of Australia.
	The Wikimedia Australia chapter can be contacted via email to helpwikimedia.org.au for non-editorial assistance.

Awards Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Awards, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of awards and prizes on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.AwardsWikipedia:WikiProject AwardsTemplate:WikiProject Awardsawards articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Lists Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Lists, an attempt to structure and organize all list pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.ListsWikipedia:WikiProject ListsTemplate:WikiProject ListsList articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

Regarding equating this with the Pulitzer prize: Who has often considered them equivalent? Perhaps the sentence needs rewording. Regardless of POV, this fact still needs a citation to show it is indeed regarded as Autralia's top literary award. Please read verifiability. Frexes 15:56, 5 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to cite the bleeding obvious, feel free to waste your own time - I don't imagine it'd be hard to find. Otherwise, please leave the article alone. Rebecca 04:58, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have added the citations myself. It may be surprising you, but there are people who are not from Australia: this is not "bleeding obvious" to them. Indeed many will never have heard of these awards. As it states in the Wikipedia guidelines, facts that are of the sort "I heard it somewhere/It's common knowledge (...amongst a select group)" should be removed, or given citation. Please also remember Wikipedia etiquette and try to stay cool. Thanks! Frexes 14:01, 6 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"They can be regarded as the Australian equivalent of the Pulitzer Prize." The first citation is from the organisation itself, which is not an independent source, and the second citation doesn't even mention the Pulitzer. Like any award, there will be a diversity of views on its worth. I don't think it adds anything to the article to include the organisation's self-congratulatory assessment of itself as if it's a NPOV statement --GuyIncognito (talk) 03:22, 10 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Should the categories be listed in a table?

The categories section is very long. I wonder if it would be better listed in 2 columns. I'm not sure how to do that. Maybe a table? 124.168.21.24 06:51, 25 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Controversy is overdone

It may have been a good idea at the time, but the section on the Milne-Mayne 2006 fracas is given far too much weight to the overall detriment of the article, and needs to be heavily pruned. I'm prepared to do this after giving folk a chance to disagree. Cheers Bjenks (talk) 10:29, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I agree entirely - I don't think it even warrants mentioning at all here, considering how long the Walkley Awards have been occurring, unless a greatly expanded history section magically appears at some point in the future. Bump it all off to the Glenn Milne article. Rebecca (talk) 10:49, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Walkley Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20110524132925/http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20849892-25090,00.html to http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,20867,20849892-25090,00.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 12:51, 28 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Walkley Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090122224436/http://www.walkleys.com/the-awards/winners/2008-walkley-award-winners.html to http://www.walkleys.com/the-awards/winners/2008-walkley-award-winners.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:40, 10 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Walkley Awards. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 00:29, 5 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]