Talk:WMYD

WMYD has been listed as one of the Media and drama good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

WMYD is part of the ON TV (TV network) series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
August 23, 2022	Good article nominee	Listed
October 31, 2022	Good topic candidate	Promoted

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on September 15, 2022.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that datacasting tests by a Detroit TV station included a ceremonial broadcast of an early automobile patent from 1886?

Current status: Good article

Television: Stations Low‑importance

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force (assessed as Mid-importance).

Michigan: Detroit Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Detroit task force.

Baseball Low‑importance

	Baseball portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Baseball, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of baseball on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BaseballWikipedia:WikiProject BaseballTemplate:WikiProject BaseballBaseball
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

It is requested that an image or photograph of Station management, American Center Building, 27777 Franklin Road, Suite 1220, Southfield, MI 48034 be included in this article to improve its quality. Please replace this template with a more specific media request template where possible.
Wikipedians in Detroit may be able to help!
The Free Image Search Tool or Openverse Creative Commons Search may be able to locate suitable images on Flickr and other web sites.

Upload

The CW

I'm noticing quite a bit of unsourced speculation in articles on present UPN and WB affiliates. For example, is there any source which states that WDWB will revert to its WXON calls? -- SwissCelt 15:34, 28 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No more WB ? Bring The Ghoul back !

Now that the once and future WXON will be an independent station once again, I think the first thing they should do is bring The Ghoul back to Detroit! Ghoul power rules !

WDWB-TV to WXON-TV?

It can happen. look at KUAM-TV and KUAM-LP...same call-signs, different suffixes.... of course, they may have to ask WXON-LP in Flint, Michigan for permission.

Raccoon Fox 22:03, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It can happen, surely. But Wikipedia is not the place for unfounded speculation; as they say, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. Unless and until some source says that this will happen, the idea that WDWB "will" (read: might) revert to its WXON calls does not belong in this article. -- SwissCelt 23:11, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WJMY-TV actually was on from about Sept 1962, running for a few months then going off the air in Jun 1963. WKBD 50 was the first successful independent station in Detroit (and the second successful UHF, after the channel 56 public television station) in 1965. WXON went on the air in 1968 on Ch 62, as the article correctly states, then changed to Ch 20 after buying out the facilities of WJMY (inactive for nine years). The Ch 62 facilities were taken up by WGPR in the mid-1970s, becoming the first African-American (contemporary term "black") owned and operated TV station in the US. I'm not clear on post 1981 shuffling, however. GBC 21:56, 6 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WMYD and Wikipedia

Perhaps we wikipedians should be flattered or proud that WMYD has basically copied our history on their station when they updated their history on their website... http://www.tv20detroit.com/home/connectwith/8879587.html :) RingtailedFox • Talk • Stalk 02:33, 1 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:WJMY20.jpg

The image Image:WJMY20.jpg is used in this article under a claim of fair use, but it does not have an adequate explanation for why it meets the requirements for such images when used here. In particular, for each page the image is used on, it must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Please check

That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's description page for the use in this article.
That this article is linked to from the image description page.

This is an automated notice by FairuseBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. --08:18, 4 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on WMYD. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20120302112304/http://www.fwbusiness.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5952:Good-evening,-Detroit&catid=51:latest&Itemid=6 to http://www.fwbusiness.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=5952:Good-evening,-Detroit&catid=51:latest&Itemid=6

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 06:10, 13 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WMYD. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added {{dead link}} tag to http://hraunfoss.fcc.gov/edocs_public/attachmatch/DA-06-1082A2.pdf
Added archive http://web.archive.org/web/20090127020949/http://www.macon.com:80/149/story/576881.html to http://www.macon.com/149/story/576881.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:37, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on WMYD. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:50, 10 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on WMYD. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:43, 31 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Spotchecks

Sammi, I should have done spotchecks when I promoted this to GA, so I've gone back and done some now. I came up with one question:

FN 71 cites "Granite's high debt load continued to motivate attempts to sell WDWB and its San Francisco sister station KBWB. In September 2005, Granite announced its intention to sell WDWB and KBWB to AM Media Holdings, Inc., a company mostly owned by ACON Investments, for a total of $180 million." I don't see support in the source for the mention of Granite's debt load as motivation, or for "mostly owned".

I checked several other cites and this was the only issue that came up. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 12:19, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The fact that you're doing this is admirable, Mike Christie. I have added two new refs in this area that more explicitly note the debt load issue. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 17:37, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

OK, thanks. Well, I guess it's a good thing; I wish I'd done these spot checks first time round! To my surprise, less than half of the GAs I promoted without spotchecks had absolutely no changes needed when I spotchecked. Quite a few more only had one minor issue, like this one, but some have (or had -- some are fixed) major issues. And I'm leaving the Doug Coldwell ones till last since I suspect I'll have to GAR those. Mike Christie (talk - contribs - library) 17:46, 7 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]