Talk:WKLT

	Radio portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Radio Stations, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of radio stations on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Radio StationsWikipedia:WikiProject Radio StationsTemplate:WikiProject Radio StationsRadio station articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Michigan Low‑importance

	Michigan portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Michigan, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Michigan on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MichiganWikipedia:WikiProject MichiganTemplate:WikiProject MichiganMichigan articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Cleanup

I just removed a large part of the article. A lot of the content consisted of rumours and other biased information. If you want to expand this article with facts, please do so, but remember to use credible sources and only add information that's verifiable for other editors! Thanks, Joann e B 15:46, 24 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

What about the history?

I keep adding the history in, it appears sound, keeps being reverted, additionally, mentioning the "opinion" of listenrs during the 1990's, certainly is permissable under wiki's npov standards, I can live without reference to the personalities at the station, but that WKLT is out of the mainstream of Rock radio stations for it's heavy classics playlist as well as the ownership history are verifiable, NPOV items..66.72.215.225 20:55, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"It appears sound" is not good enough... Sentences that start with "rumour has it" are not the kind of content that an encyclopedia should have! There are a lot of facts in the part of the article that I deleted, and yes, those are very possible verifiable, NPOV items, but could you please provide the source for what you're adding? I do not nescessarily want to keep this article the stub that it is (and of course I'm not the one deciding what an article should be like), but if any facts are added, they should be based on something other than just the memory of listeners. Is there a book or a website that could be referred to? --Joann e B 21:58, 25 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

History without a point of view

I am removing much of the viewpoints expressed in this article. History that is verifiable remains. MarkElliott 02:13, 13 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]