This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion.
To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
Overall: Everything checks out, an interesting choice of word (from the cited pub;and I have no issue with it), but they've also used the term lavish in there. But can toning it down a bit for the gullibility of a wider audience be considered? Like, rewriting it using one of the more known synonyms instead, such as "luxurious"? Let me know your opinion. PS: I've done some minor copy editing, but overall it's nicely written. And congrats on your 700th. X (talk) 06:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Putting this note here. The original version of this article lacks much info about local programming, and that's because I figure it was deliberately undercovered by The Florida Times-Union. I struggled to find anything substantial. At the time, it was still competing with the Jacksonville Journal, which owned WJHP-TV (The Times-Union bought the Journal in 1959). I suspect the Journal would have much more detail on 36's programming, but alas, it's not digitized as of May 2024. Sammi Brie (she/her • t • c) 19:56, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Everything checks out, an interesting choice of word (from the cited pub;and I have no issue with it), but they've also used the term lavish in there. But can toning it down a bit for the gullibility of a wider audience be considered? Like, rewriting it using one of the more known synonyms instead, such as "luxurious"? Let me know your opinion. PS: I've done some minor copy editing, but overall it's nicely written. And congrats on your 700th. X (talk) 06:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Approved.