Talk:WHO Blue Books

A fact from WHO Blue Books appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 27 July 2021 (check views). The text of the entry was as follows:

Did you know... that the WHO Blue Books give expert consensus opinion on cancers?

A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2021/July. The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/WHO Blue Books.

Wikipedia

Books

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook articles

Medicine Low‑importance

	Medicine portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Medicine, which recommends that medicine-related articles follow the Manual of Style for medicine-related articles and that biomedical information in any article use high-quality medical sources. Please visit the project page for details or ask questions at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Medicine.MedicineWikipedia:WikiProject MedicineTemplate:WikiProject Medicinemedicine articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Did you know nomination

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by SL93 (talk) 03:13, 24 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(

Comment or view
Article history

)

... that the WHO Blue Books give expert consensus opinion on cancers? making a consensus vital for pathologists around the world That’s what the World Health Organisation (WHO)’s Classification of Tumors series [1]

Reviewed: Pomme d'Or Hotel

Created by Whispyhistory (talk) and Philafrenzy (talk). Nominated by Whispyhistory (talk) at 16:55, 14 July 2021 (UTC).[reply]

Long enough and new enough. The page was created on July 7th, and even though DYK check says that it was no expanded 5x within the last 10 days, it has obviously been expanded 5x since its creation on the 7th and its nomination on the 14th. It appears neutral and the sources I spot-checked supported the prose that cited them. No close paraphrasing or copyvios detected. QPQ done. The hook is supported by an in-line citation directly after the information in the article. It could be more "hook-y", like summarizing the problem of bias in expert consensus mentioned in the last section on the page, but since this is a subjective thing, I approve the current hook. Rachel Helps (BYU) (talk) 17:44, 21 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]