Talk:WCIV

United States: Television / South Carolina Low‑importance

	United States portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions. Template Usage Articles Requested! Become a Member Project Talk Alerts United StatesWikipedia:WikiProject United StatesTemplate:WikiProject United StatesUnited States articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Television portal This article is supported by American television task force (assessed as Low-importance).
	South Carolina portal This article is supported by WikiProject South Carolina (assessed as Low-importance).

Television: Stations

	Television portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Television, a collaborative effort to develop and improve Wikipedia articles about television programs. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page where you can join the discussion. To improve this article, please refer to the style guidelines for the type of work.TelevisionWikipedia:WikiProject TelevisionTemplate:WikiProject Televisiontelevision articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the Television stations task force.

Complaint

Why is the WCIV article on Wikipedia is semi-protected. The Wikipedia protection policy has gone too far, this is suppose to be The Free Encyclopedia not the unfree. Shkarter1985 (talk) 19:26, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Because an IP user was continuously adding highly dubious slogans to this and dozens of other television show pages. There was (and remains) concern that these slogans are entirely fictitious, and being added to disrupt the quality of television show pages; at best, they are unsourced and unlikely. To prevent the disruption, the article was temporarily semi-protected. When possible, we prefer to target just the individual "offender", but, in this case, the person changes IP addresses regularly, and, after several months of the same behavior, has never once communicated with other editors. Note that once you become autoconfirmed (10 edits to regular pages and 4 days), you'll be able to edit it directly; alternatively, if you want to request an edit right now, you can do so here, on the talk page; finally, the protection will end in about 20 hours, so everyone will be able to edit it then. In essence, everyone is still free to edit the page, they just have to use an alternate method if they are unwilling or unable to create an account. Qwyrxian (talk) 21:32, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, your redlinked username fooled me; you can already edit the page directly. Why the complaint? Semi-protection is the only way we have to protect pages from intentional disruption by people w/o named accounts. Qwyrxian (talk) 21:35, 3 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Wciv (2).png Nominated for speedy Deletion

An image used in this article, File:Wciv (2).png, has been nominated for speedy deletion for the following reason: All Wikipedia files with unknown copyright status

What should I do?

Don't panic; you should have time to contest the deletion (although please review deletion guidelines before doing so). The best way to contest this form of deletion is by posting on the image talk page.

If the image is non-free then you may need to provide a fair use rationale
If the image isn't freely licensed and there is no fair use rationale, then it cannot be uploaded or used.
If the image has already been deleted you may want to try Deletion Review

This notification is provided by a Bot --CommonsNotificationBot (talk) 21:20, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:WMMP which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 02:29, 30 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]