Talk:Vučedol culture

Croatia Mid‑importance

	Croatia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Croatia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Croatia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CroatiaWikipedia:WikiProject CroatiaTemplate:WikiProject CroatiaCroatia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Serbia Mid‑importance

	Serbia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Serbia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Serbia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SerbiaWikipedia:WikiProject SerbiaTemplate:WikiProject SerbiaSerbia articles
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Archaeology

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Archaeology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Archaeology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.ArchaeologyWikipedia:WikiProject ArchaeologyTemplate:WikiProject ArchaeologyArchaeology articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

The skeptic

sheer speculation! Gow 14:44, 22 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is still true. The author seems not to be able to distinguish between facts and opinions! HJJHolm (talk) 16:20, 23 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Clean-up

Well, we don't know, do we? This thing needs a "strong and powerful" clean-up at which time its truth can be evaluated and corrected. The part about Troy and the Italics - if someone credible holds those theories we are sort of obliged now to put them in. The editor started the article and it isn't fair to blame him for his English but if he has something to say it needs to be in. I'm not sure he is able to do his own English refs so maybe someone should help him along. One for all and all for one.Dave (talk) 23:28, 15 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Vučedol culture. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 15:33, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

"Kostolac culture" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Kostolac culture. Please participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. - speednat (talk) 07:48, 17 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Oldest calendar

I'd like to see a year cited. Reference 10 is a “no find”.

[1] says 2600 BC, but it's a blog.

I suppose (as per talk above) there's not much to back it up.

MBG02 (talk) 19:17, 18 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

MBG02 thanks for the note, please feel free to use WP:CLEANUPTAG to mark these kinds of issues more clearly in the future. I previously came across the same issue and had found a half-decent reference, so I updated the text a bit. --Joy [shallot] (talk) 08:47, 19 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]