Talk:Vought XSO2U/GA1

GA Review

Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch

Reviewer: WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 00:12, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I will review this over the weekend:

The first thing I noticed was that the article seems a little on the small side. Can you reticify that? That won't stop it from passing GAN, but you might have problems higher up, like at FAC. WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 00:12, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I can see what I can do, but I don't think there's much more available. I can try to get some interlibrary loan books perhaps. Wasn't really thinking of going beyond GA, but, of course, you never know. And thanks! - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 00:28, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- <overinflated ego>Well, I have an airplane that progressed no farther than the drawing board, yet is longer. Proof: [1].</overinflated ego> It is always good to blaze a path through FA. I copyedited and added some links to the article, please take a look. WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 21:57, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Well, the napkinwaffe that is "Luft '46" probably has used up more trees writing about it than the Germans did for the blueprints. =P But fair point. And nice work! - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:12, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You are writing this in British English, right? Some of the words I come across are spelled ... *aha!* interestingly. WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 21:59, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Heavy reliance on Adcock, something that will haunt you in FAC and ACR if you don't fix it now (maybe even a GAR). WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 22:08, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Beyond that, I think this article can pass. Good work. WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 22:10, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yup, I use a 'British-ish English' primarily; I'll see if I can find any additional sources, but as a "failed project" there's not much out there on the SO2U. So, it passed? Awesome. Much thanks! - The Bushranger _{One ping only} 23:11, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Yes it does. Good job. WikiCopter (♠ • ♣ • ♥ • ♦ • simple • commons • lost • cvu • onau) 23:14, 15 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]