Talk:Vorbis comment

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Software, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of software on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SoftwareWikipedia:WikiProject SoftwareTemplate:WikiProject Softwaresoftware articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Computing (assessed as Low-importance).

Tip: Anchors are case-sensitive in most browsers.

This article links to one or more target anchors that no longer exist.

[[endianness##Big-endian|big-endian]]

Please help fix the broken anchors. You can remove this template after fixing the problems. | Reporting errors

AudioGrail

82.240.189.110, is there something notable about AudioGrail? It looks to be Yet Another Tag Editor. Unless it does something unique and specific to Ogg Vorbis comments, we either need a much larger list in a separate article, or we should remove it entirely. piman 19:16, 7 January 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Change of article title

Should the title of this article not be VorbisComment rather than Vorbis comment? The former is used on the Xiph.Org wiki, as seen here. 151.226.52.75 (talk) 22:35, 29 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

TRACKTOTAL is also a de facto standard

TRACKTOTAL is also a de facto standard, as seen in ABCDE source code:

   # TRACKTOTAL is not in the proposed, minimal list of standard field names from
   # xiph.org: https://www.xiph.org/vorbis/doc/v-comment.html but is in common usage
   # and read by mediainfo, ffprobe, vlc, Aqualung, ogg123, Foobar. And now abcde :)
   # The tag is quietly ignored by Audacious, MPlayer, mpv, XMMS....

That's why I added it in the de facto list in the article (but it got reverted).

Creak (talk) 14:07, 22 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]