Jump to content

Talk:Volta (album)/Archive 1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 1

title - Totempole

source —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 204.52.215.115 (talk) 00:29, 10 February 2007 (UTC).

source The Danish music site "Diskant" also calls the new album "Totempole". / Twincinema 20:32, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

Volta has leaked

Volta has been accidentally leaked onto the iTunes Music Store. [1]. 58.107.168.144 00:07, 28 April 2007 (UTC)

It's now leaked all over the internet. Shaybear♥

Location of Recording?

Article currently states 7 songs were recorded in New York. Her Website http://unit.bjork.com/specials/albums/volta/ lists four songs as being recorded in New York, and 190.18.52.82 (talk) 18:16, 28 January 2008 (UTC)gives a different location for each one. If it was the case that seven tracks were recorded at the session and only one ended up on the album this should be made clearer.

Also, her website lists "the boat" as a studio in three different locations- i know she went round the world with M. Barney on a boat and assume the boat refers to this trip but if anyone know this for certain that would be great addition. 3tmx 13:20, 5 May 2007 (UTC)

Alternative Cover

Hi, i'm from Argentina and i wanted to know why there was an alternative cover for porland and latin america (??)

second, do you know anything about the rumours that bjork was going to come to argentina and also chile? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 190.49.50.175 (talkcontribs) 04:44, 7 July 2007 (UTC)

the alternate cover is probably so they can use a normal jewel case for those releases of the album. furthermore you can find her tour dates multiple places online.68.255.172.91 12:35, 13 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:Voltalatino.png

Image:Voltalatino.png is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 14:50, 19 July 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:28898.bjorkcover.jpg

Image:28898.bjorkcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 15:34, 5 November 2007 (UTC)

1 link removed- Interview footage - No clear indication from clip information or uploader profile that uploader has rigts to the footage concerned. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:12, 21 November 2007 (UTC)

Special edition

I recently bought myself this album in a CD shop in Buenos Aires. The cover didn't have the red background it shows on the article, but rather it has a black background, with a close-up of Björk with facepaint, posed as if she were holding a bow, and on fire. On the upper-right corner it says "Edición especial para América Latina" (Special Edition For Latin America). What's supposed to be the booklet with the lyrics is not actually a booklet. Instead, all the lyrics and their credits are crammed into two pages, making it harder to read than the grey-and-black of Medúlla's lyrics booklet. Is this the same as in other countries? Or were the cover and booklet changed for Latin America for some reason?190.18.52.82 (talk) 18:16, 28 January 2008 (UTC)

Same thing also happens to "Special Malaysia Edition".--203.106.119.250 (talk) 11:43, 11 May 2008 (UTC)

Tour dates

Since when was it ok to post entire tour itineraries in Wikipedia? It's trivial information and taking up so much room. Leopold Stotch (talk) 18:54, 10 October 2008 (UTC)

US Certification

Since it sold half a million copies in the US, isn't it certified Gold? 121.54.32.154 (talk) 14:47, 21 June 2011 (UTC)