Talk:Volga–Don Canal

Russia: Technology & engineering / Visual arts / Economy / Physical geography High‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the technology and engineering in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the visual arts in Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the economy of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the physical geography of Russia task force.

Soviet Union Low‑importance

	Soviet Union portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Soviet Union, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Soviet UnionWikipedia:WikiProject Soviet UnionTemplate:WikiProject Soviet UnionSoviet Union
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Map needed

It is requested that a map or maps be included in this article to improve its quality.
Wikipedians in Russia may be able to help!

Length, Width, Depth?

It would be useful to know the maximum size vessels that can transit the canal. -- Geo Swan 06:01, 6 February 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Southern route:

max length: 140 m Max width: 16m max draft: 3.2m Max air draft: 13.5m Max weight: 4164 tonnes

Northern Route:

max length: 190 m Max width: 16m max draft: 2.75 m Max air draft: 2.4 m Max weight: 4168 tonnes

Elevation

This is one canal where the elevation could be of great interest, in light of global warming.

In general, most speculation on global warming asserts that if either Greenland's or West Antarctica's ice sheets melt, either one will raise mean sea level by 20 to 30 feet. Both would raise it accordingly.

The entire Volga basin is already at low relief and elevation. The area where this canal was dug seems, as far as I can tell, to be the relief between the Caspian Sea Depression and the world's oceans in general is lowest. In other words, if global mean sea level rises, this is the point where the global ocean would first breach to rise separating it from the largest exposed depression still below sea level. All the major cities along the Caspian Sea, plus a considerable amount of rural area in general, could be flooded.

The question is, then: what is the elevation along this watershed divide, and under what global warming scenarios could rising sea levels manage to flood the Caspian Depression?

I don't believe any other depression on earth has the same combination of low relief, large population, and wide area at possible risk.--Disgustedandamused 04:30, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Volgograd sits at 145 meters (475 feet) above sea level, so I don't think there is much danger. Kmusser 18:08, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Volgograd says "Altitude: 0-102 m", and my atlas puts it at sealevel. However, the article says the high point of the canal is 88 m above the Volga, so still no danger of overflowing.

—wwoods 21:15, 2 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, the "critical point" for the Caspian Depression is the Kuma-Manych Trench, rather than the Volga-Don Canal area. The sea level would need to rise 27 m (90 feet) for the sea water to start flowing via the Manych River valley into the Caspian Depression. This is much less than what is needed for the sea to reach the Volgograd area. (Of course, the 27 m sea level rise would be pretty apocalyptic... the worst case forecast for the next 100 years is around 2 m). -- Vmenkov (talk) 21:51, 14 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified (January 2018)

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on Volga–Don Canal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:00, 23 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion:

Scheme of Tanais fortifications.jpg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 22:53, 7 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]