Talk:Vladimir of Bulgaria

Bulgaria Low‑importance

	Bulgaria portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Bulgaria, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Bulgaria on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.BulgariaWikipedia:WikiProject BulgariaTemplate:WikiProject BulgariaBulgaria
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Biography: Royalty and Nobility

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
	This article is supported by WikiProject Royalty and Nobility.

Middle Ages Low‑importance

	Middle Ages portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Middle Ages, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Middle Ages on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Middle AgesWikipedia:WikiProject Middle AgesTemplate:WikiProject Middle AgesMiddle Ages
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Untitled

You are absolutely right. Only one Bulgarian tzar had also the title "King", and that was Kaloyan.

Vladimir of Bulgaria was not a king. After the adoption of Christianity by his father, Khan Boris (later Prince Boris I Michael), the Bulgarian rulers adopted the title of princes, until Simeon I proclaimed himself a "tsar" (Caesar, German: Kaiser), that is, emperor. Byzantium, however, recognised the title of "tsar" to Simeon's son Peter I, along with the independence of the Bulgarian church with a patriarch, the first Orthodox patriarch among the countries which adopted Orthodox Christianity from Byzantium. The second independent church was the Serbian, which obtained an independent church with a patriarch, during the rule of the Serbian tsar (emperor) - Stefan Dusan. Bulgaria virtually had no rulers with the title "king". Its modern time rulers (after the Independence from Turkey in 1908) proclaimed themselves "tsars" to remind of the glorious past, although translated the title as "king, roi, König". So, to say that Vladimir was a "king" is all but correct

I have no knowledge of this myself, but this criticism seems well-founded, so I've made some changes to the text accordingly. /Nicke L 13:26, 1 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I agree that, to say Vladimir was a "king" is all but correct, but the same goes wit “prince”! There never were “kings” neither “princes” of Bulgaria – there were “knyazes” and “tsars”. Knyaz actually corresponds to king; it became depreciated only after “tsars”. “Tsar” is higher then “knyaz” - "king". The etymology of „knyaz"is directly related to the English King, the German König, and the Scandinavian konung. It has always been a title of a monarch and it is wrong to depreciate it to prince. The title of Vladimir was knyaz, Boris I – his father was also “knyaz”, Simeon I was pronounced “tsar” and ever after all monarchs of Bulgaria was “tsars”, with exception of Alexander I Battenberg who was “knyaz” and Ferdinand I, who was “knyaz” until 22 September ( 5 October) 1908 - The Declaration of Independence from the Ottoman Empire, when Ferdinand I became “tsar”. All this is well known and beyond doubt! Therefore “prince” Vladimir, should be replaced with “knyaz” Vladimir!

Name

In Bulgarian historiography, as well as by some English-language scholars, the name "Vladimir-Rasate" is used. The Bulgarian WP uses bg:Владимир-Расате.--Zoupan 21:00, 2 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]