This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of internet culture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Internet cultureWikipedia:WikiProject Internet cultureTemplate:WikiProject Internet cultureInternet culture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sociology, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of sociology on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SociologyWikipedia:WikiProject SociologyTemplate:WikiProject Sociologysociology
Did I get this right that it's basically about media selection and and not media sharing? If so this should be reflected in the lead, which I think should be made clearer in any way.
Also section titles like "Broadband video takes off" and "Social networking meets video" are suboptimal, those aren't informal titles.
In the section "Early examples of visual networking" YouTube and telepresence are named. However it's not explained how visual networking is happening on and/or with youtube and the prospects of telepresence for it.
And "Other visual networking applications" is also not a good section-title because it's not quite clear what "Other" is referring to here as it's not a subsection.
