Talk:Visions Metro Weekly

New Jersey Low‑importance

	New Jersey portal This article is part of WikiProject New Jersey, an effort to create, expand, and improve New Jersey–related articles to Wikipedia feature-quality standard. Please join in the discussion.New JerseyWikipedia:WikiProject New JerseyTemplate:WikiProject New JerseyNew Jersey articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

African diaspora Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject African diaspora, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of African diaspora on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.African diasporaWikipedia:WikiProject African diasporaTemplate:WikiProject African diasporaAfrican diaspora articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Journalism Low‑importance

	Journalism portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Journalism, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of journalism on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.JournalismWikipedia:WikiProject JournalismTemplate:WikiProject JournalismJournalism articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Notability tag

Concerning the notability tag I could move this article to Twin Visions or to Visions Metro Weekly - this one is wanted, see Wikipedia:WikiProject Missing encyclopedic articles/List of US Newspapers/New Jersey, but as has been stated in this article, Howard Scott, who I know since years, is the sole money contributor, editor, publisher and even distributor of this newspaper since over two and half decades, with the exception of one time subscription of $100,000 in 2005 by mayor of Newark Sharpe James for writing a series of articles about positive projects initiated by the city of Newark, such as free shots or police-on-a-block program, which didn't have sufficient coverage back then. I think he deserves a separate article. I'm going to introduce the Visions Metro Weekly article shortly after I get an image of it. Will be in Newark on Monday. And then we'll see, merge them both or keep these articles separate. greg park avenue (talk) 15:34, 30 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I support the idea of moving this to Visions Metro Weekly. Once you do, more can be written on this subject without the usual limitations of WP:BLP. For a different example of what else can be added to it, please take a look at the article I worked on, about a U.S. daily called The Free Lance–Star. Cheers, Poeticbent talk 18:50, 10 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

- All right, Poeticbent, let's move it. But it needs some rewriting before and I don't have now time. If you have, be my guest. Will be back on X-mas Day. Hope they don't ban me until then. They really wanna ban me for one year for one mistake done 8 months before? Wouldn't believe it if I wouldn't see it with my own eyes. Thought the ArbCom is the last resort to do that, not the first. Cheer up. greg park avenue (talk) 20:01, 21 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Visions Metro Weekly. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/20100730075347/http://bneonsigns.com:80/missiondoit.com/id1.html to http://bneonsigns.com/missiondoit.com/id1.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—^{cyberbot II}_{Talk to my owner:Online} 02:12, 26 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]