Talk:Virtual Equality

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Books. To participate in the project, please visit its page, where you can join the project and discuss matters related to book articles. To use this banner, please refer to the documentation. To improve this article, please refer to the relevant guideline for the type of work.BooksWikipedia:WikiProject BooksTemplate:WikiProject BooksBook

Human rights Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Human rights, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human rights on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Human rightsWikipedia:WikiProject Human rightsTemplate:WikiProject Human rightsHuman rights
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

LGBTQ+ studies

This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies

Politics

	Politics portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Politics, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of politics on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PoliticsWikipedia:WikiProject PoliticsTemplate:WikiProject Politicspolitics
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the project's importance scale.

Assessment (Check against B-Class Criterias)

Taking care of the request for assessment backlog. The article was set up on October 26, 2017.

B1: The article is suitably referenced, with inline citations. All statements are referenced with a diversity of sources. The style is consistent throughout the article. passed

B2: The article reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. I agree with the template at the summary-section. This part needs expansion. The Stonewall Book Award, while prominently mentioned in the lead, drowns a little bit in the article text body. It may also deserve one or two sentences more. failed

B3: The article has a defined structure. The article is structured within reason. passed

B4: The article is reasonably well-written. Everything is written as it can be expected from a B-Class article. passed

B5: The article contains supporting materials where appropriate. The Infobox is an advantage. Additional images would be purely optional. passed

B6: The article presents its content in an appropriately understandable way. No problems in this area. passed

All in all the article qualifies as Class C with just a little bit of expansion needed for B. Gehenna1510 (talk) 21:43, 3 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]