Talk:Virginia State Police

	Law portal This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Law Enforcement. Please Join, Create, and Assess.Law EnforcementWikipedia:WikiProject Law EnforcementTemplate:WikiProject Law EnforcementLaw enforcement articles
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

Virginia High‑importance

	Virginia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
High	This article has been rated as High-importance on the project's importance scale.

Frankly, this article will need a lot of help. The history website is not entirely clear, so I'm not even sure if the establishment date is 100% correct. However, this article needs to exist. ~ The Rebel At ~ 23:25, 9 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Law Enforcement rating

I have posted a question regarding WikiProject Law Enforcement's assessment of this article on the WikiProject's Talk page. --TommyBoy (talk) 17:48, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, the article has been reassessed. --TommyBoy (talk) 23:01, 3 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have re-assessed this article as Start-class, because it is clearly not Stub-class anymore. --TommyBoy (talk) 01:21, 4 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The article has been downgraded back down Stub by both WikiProject Law Enforcement and WikiProject Virginia due to copyright violations. Any assistance from my fellow Wikipedians in improving the article in a manner consistent with applicable policies and guidelines in order to restore the article to its previous higher assessment would be most appreciated. --TommyBoy (talk) 00:41, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright violations

I've reverted this article to the version as of 14:36, 20 March 2008. After this User:HardCharger2103 introduced massive copyright violations from [1], most directly from [2]. Although I have not verified every section they introduced I've checked enough of them that everything the user introduced is suspect. As that series of edits completely changed the whole article anything after that date is a deritative work and so also in breach of copyright. Dpmuk (talk) 16:39, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]