Talk:Vipsania gens

Classical Greece and Rome Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical Greece and Rome, a group of contributors interested in Wikipedia's articles on classics. If you would like to join the WikiProject or learn how to contribute, please see our project page. If you need assistance from a classicist, please see our talk page.Classical Greece and RomeWikipedia:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeTemplate:WikiProject Classical Greece and RomeClassical Greece and Rome articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

M. Vipsanius on Virgil

You're right, this note turned out to be super long. @P Aculeius: do you think the subject can pass GNG and the stuff split into a separate article? There is even more in other sources about people discussing who this is or isn't, but in the end the persons own biography isn't much.★Trekker (talk) 20:11, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I think it could support an article, based on the controversy and number of sources, but it's probably okay to leave it where it is. I generally try to avoid extended discussions because, like citation templates and external links in the list of members, they can make editing the page much harder—but once in a while won't hurt anything. In either case he still needs to be on this page, roughly where he is now—he seems to be a contemporary of Agrippa, but isn't likely to belong to his parents' generation. Hope my adjustments to your wording and other minor corrections didn't annoy you! P Aculeius (talk) 20:23, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@P Aculeius: No I'm always thankful for other editors double checking and cleaning up my writing!★Trekker (talk) 22:20, 3 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Origins

This book discusses the gentes possible Etruscan origin and this one possible Venetian origins. ★Trekker (talk) 22:28, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The first source you mention is already cited for this point in the article, although it could probably stand to be elaborated on. The second source I can only see in snippet view, so you may need to help with it, and I am skeptical about the Vipsanii coming to prominence at Rome before the Augustan era, if they were Venetian or Illyrian. An Etruscan origin seems more likely at this early date, although the fact that Vipsanius and Vipsanus appear to have been interchangeable still supports a more mundane origin, the nomen being derived from a Latin place-name or cognomen. I am not ruling out the alternatives—merely stating that the evidence is far from conclusive. P Aculeius (talk) 23:19, 9 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Sadly I can not read the whole text either. Hopefully I will be able to find the whole information eventually.★Trekker (talk) 11:18, 10 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]