Talk:Violin Concerto No. 1 (Bartók)

	Classical music portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Classical music, which aims to improve, expand, copy edit, and maintain all articles related to classical music, that are not covered by other classical music related projects. Please read the guidelines for writing and maintaining articles. To participate, you can edit this article or visit the project page for more details.Classical musicWikipedia:WikiProject Classical musicTemplate:WikiProject Classical musicClassical music articles
	This article is supported by Compositions task force.

Dead Links

Both the reference link and the external link no longer go to the linked articles. I have attempted to relocate them without success. Alternate reference links are needed.Graham1973 (talk) 03:34, 13 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

One link went to the subscription-only JSTOR site; the other one was truly a dead link. I have removed them both, and straightened out the mangled syntax of the listing, which evidently stemmed partly from the use of an inappropriate template, which I have also removed.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 01:51, 5 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing Style

I would like to suggest that the referencing style be updated. I almost added the "No Footnotes" template because the first place I looked was the reflist and there was no indication that anything was there. It is possible to overlook the text only references for this reason.Graham1973 (talk) 15:44, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The referencing style in this article is fully up to date. If you are not familiar with parenthetical referencing, then I suggest you follow the link. Also please see WP:CITEVAR. It seems to me that the possibility of overlooking the presence of the inline references is a good thing, as it demonstrates their unobtrusiveness. What is sorely needed here instead is the addition of citations at the points where they are requested.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 21:19, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Further note: Those challenged claims dated back to March 2012, and have now been removed. I think you will agree that the referencing is now plainer to see, without all the alarm-bell clutter.—Jerome Kohl (talk) 21:25, 18 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]