Talk:Vijayawada Junction railway station

Trains Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trains, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to rail transport on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. See also: WikiProject Trains to do list and the Trains Portal.TrainsWikipedia:WikiProject TrainsTemplate:WikiProject Trainsrail transport articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Associated projects or task forces:
/
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian railways.

India: Andhra Pradesh / Railways Low‑importance

	India portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject India, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of India-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page.IndiaWikipedia:WikiProject IndiaTemplate:WikiProject IndiaIndia articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Andhra Pradesh (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by WikiProject Indian railways (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article was last assessed in November 2014.

Name change

The name of the railway station is Vijayawada. It is clearly written at the entrance to the station. See picture in the Infobox. Junction is a functional suffix, which is generally written on the yellow platform boards to guide passengers. I propose that this page be moved to 'Vijayawada railway station'. - Chandan Guha (talk) 01:27, 14 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - Chandan Guha (talk) 01:40, 4 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hi....Guha, why railway station in LOWER case? why did`t U moved it to Vijayawada Railway Station? regards, DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 17:32, 8 April 2013 (UTC). Place a tb.[reply]

Railway station is not part of the name. It is a common noun for identification of the page. Common nouns are generally in lower case. It is so written for most such pages in India and many other countries. See New Delhi railway station, Hyderabad Deccan railway station, Edinburgh Waverley railway station, Melbourne railway station, Cape Town railway station and so on. Cheers. - Chandan Guha (talk) 00:49, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the reply,

regards, DRAGON BOOSTER ★ 01:18, 13 April 2013 (UTC).[reply]

Priority

BZA junction is the largest Junction in India so it should be given High Importance Imahesh3847 (talk) 05:46, 31 December 2015 (UTC)mahesh[reply]

It is not about city, it is about how article is written. If you don't have idea, leave it to editors who are familiar.--Vin09 (talk) 03:20, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Vijayawada Junction railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 13:10, 21 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]