Talk:View of the World from 9th Avenue

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the View of the World from 9th Avenue article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

View of the World from 9th Avenue has been listed as one of the Art and architecture good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.

Article milestones
Date	Process	Result
October 8, 2012	Good article nominee	Listed

A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on October 15, 2012.

The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Saul Steinberg's famous New Yorker cover, View of the World from 9th Avenue, was named the fourth greatest magazine cover in a 40-year survey?

Media Mid‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Media, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Media on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MediaWikipedia:WikiProject MediaTemplate:WikiProject MediaMedia

Mid

This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

WikiProject Media To-do List:

Here are some tasks awaiting attention:

Cleanup : Media influence, Video game culture, Sound bite
NPOV : Content (media and publishing)
Verify : Multimedia, Alternative media, Alternative newspaper
Other :
- Answer requests for comments

New York City Mid‑importance

	New York City portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject New York City, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of New York City-related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.New York CityWikipedia:WikiProject New York CityTemplate:WikiProject New York CityNew York City
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts

GA Review

This review is transcluded from Talk:View of the World from 9th Avenue/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: GreatOrangePumpkin (talk · contribs) 09:26, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

It is reasonably well written.
a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
It is factually accurate and verifiable.
a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR):
It is broad in its coverage.
a (major aspects): b (focused):
It follows the neutral point of view policy.
Fair representation without bias:
It is stable.
No edit wars, etc.:
It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate.
a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall:
Pass/Fail:

"is ~~the name of the~~ a 1976 illustration by Saul Steinberg that served as the cover of the March 29, 1976 edition of The New Yorker."
- Fixed.--13:40, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
"The work is presented from the perspective that Manhattan is the center of the world." - I don't think the usage of "that" is correct in this case (also odd usage of passive voice): "The work presents the view from Manhatten on the rest of the world"
- How is it now?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:45, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"that Steinberg's copyright had been violated." - ditto. Something like: because of copyright violations by Columbia"
- O.K.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:49, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"It is also considered an example of something that has made a person famous for the wrong reason." - perhaps: "It is considerd an example of unintentional fame", elaborate.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:52, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- What do you think of the change?
"The illustration is split in two parts"
- Thanks.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:54, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"New York presented the interpretation that the New York-centric mind's view of the rest of the world as a set of outer boroughs is what is iconic about the subject.[9]" - New York intepreted the New York-centric mind's view of the rest of the world as a set of outer boroughs as iconic"
- Fixed.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 13:58, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"Fulford, ~~while~~ writing in The National Post,"
- O.K.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:06, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
" Fulford pointed out a high school in suburban Ottawa made imitating this work an assignment in its graphic arts class," - I don't understand
- What do you think now?--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:45, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"which held that Columbia Pictures violated the copyright ~~that~~ Steinberg held on his work."
- O.K.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:10, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"with apologies to steinberg" - should Steinberg be in uppercase? If not then suggest adding a sic note
- Fixed ref.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:26, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
"that discussed the rise to prominence of the Chinese economy at the time of the the contemporary financial crisis.[13]" - perhaps replace the underlined with "burgeoning" or something similar
- O.K.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:33, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Ref 2 has no publisher--Kürbis (✔) 11:26, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Added.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:36, 8 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

1975 or 1976

TJRC, The article includes the following two sources which may point toward a 1975 creation date:

I am not sure about what the 2nd source is really saying about 1975, but the first one is a plain english statement that the work was made in 75.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 02:45, 18 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

julia santen gallery dead link

under the external sources, the link to the julia santen gallery has been taken over by some online gambling site

remove this section if you need to, after the page is cleaned — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2604:2D80:4A90:B00:51F6:5396:7658:9E7E (talk) 14:21, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Additional "view of the world" New Yorker covers

Withdrawn. ChatGPT hallucinated a bunch of non-existent covers.

Pifvyubjwm (talk) 06:06, 22 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Big Think

Note that I have been given the green light at Wikipedia:Reliable_sources/Noticeboard#BigThink.com to use Big Think as a source.-TonyTheTiger (T / C / WP:FOUR / WP:CHICAGO / WP:WAWARD) 04:58, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cross street

Which east-west street does the view look down? 2600:1702:1D00:9A80:D4E:D9EE:4297:8A1F (talk) 14:40, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

We're not supposed to do "original research" but the West Side Elevated Highway was one block over from 10th Avenue (without an intervening 11th Avenue) south of 72nd street. Much of the West Side Elevated Highway seems not to have been in use in 1976... AnonMoos (talk) 16:39, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I believe it's the street nearest The New Yorker's offices. —Tamfang (talk) 20:32, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]